House passes farm bill, crop subsidies preserved

WASHINGTON (AP/WUSA9) - The House has passed an almost $100 billion-a-year, compromise farm bill that would make small cuts to food stamps and continue generous subsidies for the nation's farmers.

The vote was 251-166. The five-year bill now goes to the Senate, which is expected to send it to the president's desk.

The measure had solid backing from the House GOP leadership, even though it makes smaller cuts to food stamps than they would have liked. The bill would cut about $800 million a year from the $80 billion-a-year program, or around 1 percent. The House had sought a 5 percent cut.

The legislation would continue to heavily subsidize major crops while eliminating some subsidies and shifting them toward more politically defensible insurance programs.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

The House is rushing to complete work on a nearly $100 billion-a-year farm bill that would make small cuts to food stamps and continue generous subsidies for the nation's farmers.

Conservative Republicans in the House helped defeat an earlier version of the bill last summer, and some of those lawmakers hoped to do so again Wednesday, saying the $800 million in annual cuts to food stamps isn't enough. But the final version of the five-year bill has solid backing from the House GOP leadership, even though it makes smaller cuts to food stamps than they would have liked.

Leaders scheduled a quick vote after the nearly 1,000-page bill was introduced Monday, giving opponents little time to build opposition.

The House Agriculture Committee chairman, Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Okla., who has been working on the bill since 2011, urged his colleagues to come together and support the bill as debate began Wednesday morning.

Earlier, he was cautiously optimistic about passage, after several years of setbacks.

"Can we create in the House a majority that is a coalition of the middle?" Lucas said Tuesday. "My gut feeling is, my reading of my colleagues, is yes."

Senate Agriculture Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., was more certain, saying she was confident the votes were there in the Democratic-led Senate. That chamber was expected to take up the bill shortly after the House.

Lucas and Stabenow have spent the past two years crafting a bill to appeal to members from all regions of the country, including a boost in money for crop insurance popular in the Midwest; higher rice and peanut subsidies for Southern farmers; and renewal of federal land payments for Western states. The cuts to food stamps - around 1 percent of the $80 billion-a-year program - are small enough that some Democrats will support them.

The final food stamp savings are generated by ending a practice in some states of boosting individual food stamp benefits by giving people a minimal amount of federal heating assistance they don't need. The cuts were brought down to $800 million a year to come closer to the Senate version of the bill, which had $400 million in annual food stamp cuts. A House bill passed in September would have cut $4 billion a year.

Still, many liberal Democrats were also expected to vote against the bill, saying the food stamp cuts were too great.

The legislation would eliminate a $4.5 billion-a-year farm subsidy called direct payments, which are paid to farmers whether they farm or not. The bill would continue to heavily subsidize major crops - corn, soybeans, wheat, rice and cotton - while shifting many of those subsidies toward more politically defensible insurance programs. That means farmers would have to incur losses before they received a payout.

The bill would save around $1.65 billion annually overall, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The amount was less than the $2.3 billion annual savings the agriculture committees originally projected for the bill.

An aide to Lucas said the difference was due to how the CBO calculated budget savings from recent automatic across-the-board spending cuts, known as sequestration.


Congressman John K. Delaney (MD-6) Statement on Passage of the Farm Bill:

"America needs a farm bill and Maryland needs a farm bill. Over 350,000 Marylanders are employed in the agricultural sector, including many in my district. This farm bill isn't perfect, but it's a vast improvement over previous versions. For decades, previous farm bills have ensured that America can produce an affordable food supply and that we can compete globally. A five year farm bill will bring certainty and stability to our farmers and agricultural entrepreneurs. Combined with recent budget agreements, I'm encouraged that we're starting to work in a bipartisan and bicameral way again.

"When you compare this legislation to the two versions I voted against last year, there is no comparison: this is a sound bipartisan compromise in accordance with our values. I was very concerned about the handling of the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) in previous versions of the bill, but this version removed the most egregious cuts. The good news is that this bill includes much smaller cuts than original House versions, and in fact, funding for many nutritional programs is increased, including support for food banks and Community Food Projects. Instead, this bill primarily reforms the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which was not being used in Maryland. No Maryland residents will have a benefit cut in this bill."


To find out more about Facebook commenting please read the
Conversation Guidelines and FAQs

Leave a Comment