Friday, October 9, 2009
UPDATE - Firefighters catch fire during sprinkler demonstration. DC Fire & EMS now confirms one firefighter spent the night in the burn unit.
Click here and then scroll down for the latest fire and EMS news from STATter911.com
Usually the biggest worry for a fire chief who has gathered the public and the press together for a sprinkler demonstration is whether the sprinkler head is going to activate as promised. Livingston Fire Protection Inc. made sure that wasn't a problem during Wednesday's demonstration using two side by side mock dorm rooms at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia. It operated at just 12 seconds into the fire.
It was the fire on the unsprinklered side that occurred minutes earlier that caused a little excitement and had Chief Dennis Rubin asking for someone to put out the firefighters. At about 3:10 on the video above you will see a plastic barrier melt and drip down in a large flaming clump on the three firefighters who were extinguishing the fire.
It was much more obvious to the audience than to the firefighters themselves that something was amiss. All three had plastic burning on their PPE. It took a little more than 30 seconds before the fires were put out.
On Friday, DC Fire & EMS Department officials confirmed that a sergeant from Engine 6 was burned on the cheek and hand. He spent the night in the MedStar Burn Unit of the Washington Hospital Center and was released.
what?? Catching fire??
Should this be consodered a live burn. I guess the RIT guys were having a cup of coffee. Good to see the white shirt come over to assist--thats right, white shirts don't need gear on when there is a fire going on, they'll never have to do anything. Our Dept has a CHief for the last 30 years that does the same thing, CHIEF, BE THE EXAMPLE ALL THE TIME!!!!
Our Chief, er I mean chief, is just a bad example.
I'm glad those paid guys weren't hurt.
-WFDT
It's sad that firefighting has become a pansy career in some places. You should practice how you play, and these guys were doing just that... some good old aggressive firefighting.
If it wasn't for some lousy structural issues with the plastic the crew would have been just fine
Pretty ugly day in a professional department.
Instead of calling them idiots why dont you question the person or persons that built this demo and ask them why there was plastic at the top frame of there demo?
Sure plastic is everywhere inside of a burning home etc...but last time i heard, plastic was not part of the materials used for wood frame construction.
-Georgetown Library
-Adam Mill Rd.
-Douglas
-Mt. Pleasant
-Chain Bridge Rd.
And now this...a simple Demonstration goes bad. It's not WASA !!!
But the thing I just can't figure out is how on this blog there are so many great fireman, but I never seem to find them on the fireground. You want to critique a video, how about you watch the endless stream of videos of you heroes burning down houses and being proud of it.
Its pretty obvious that the OIC was utilizing the opportunity to teach his guys how to correctly advance on a fire. Perhaps his department spends hundreds of hours a year in EMS training and not 10 in fire training. Maybe he was helping make sure that if there comes a time that "DEFENSIVE OPERATIONS" aren't an option, that his guys will at least know what to do, even if the rest don't. For those times when 50' away is not an option, and the trapped child's parents don't want to hear your thoughts on risk vs. reward.
Its pretty pathetic that anyone on here is bashing a group of guys because burning plastic fell on them. Its a real shame that some of our brothers were burned and you laugh because they volunteer.
It would sure be nice if some of you guys would critique your own actions the way you do other peoples, you might not like what you see.
But instead, here we are, blogging away behind the anonymous tag...talking about how great you are and regurgitation some BS article you read in Firehouse Magazine or heard at a seminar by Alan Brunacini. Unfortunately for you, it takes more than a stroke of the keyboard or a click on the Motorola to make a fire go out, which must be why I don't recognize your comments as matching up with your actions on the fireground.
Ahh the internet- be as brave as you want to be...
First.. thank goodness our BROTHERS were not seriously hurt.
Tactics aside...
1- it’s a testament to our gear that we wear now, and an example to show other why to partner check...
2- At the same time a good example how limiting our gear can be. Limited field of view obviously played a part here. How far we have come without dealing with some basic issues...
.. there will be 1000 explanations why this happened and whose fault it is...blah blah blah... Bottom line for me; I am a Chief and I will show my fire fighters this. Sure it will be some discussion, but maybe we can all be a little safer from it. Thank goodness for a video camera.
Wasnt there another video of a fire fighting "demo" that went bad like this...
"DEFENSIVE OPERATIONS" does not mean EXTERIOR
You can fight a fire or you cant'
Offensive you put the fire out INTERIOR or EXTERIOR aka heavy duty
Defensive means let the fire burn and protect exposures. In this case the exposures were the crew. I hope the firefighters have a speedy recovery. Sh!t happens. It was an accident, not an on purpose. I hope that everyone can learn from this. Maybe that the backup man needs to Literally watch the back of this nozzle man.
For the guy who asked why there was plastic on the box and maybe they didn't know it was there, isn't there another box set up beside the one burning? In fact, couldn't you see it before they went up to the fire. WTF dude? Get a clue!
The comparison to the Hillendale is that both crews lacked situational awareness. In Hillendale they went in before spraying water. This one they just didn't look up and knock it all down before they went in. They didn't catch on fire, the poly dripped on them and was burning. Same results, embarassing for the fire service.
I'm glad the crew is OK. I'm sad that there seems to be a culture that crawling inside a fire is OK? If there was somebody in there, yeah I get it. For a friggin prevention demonstration, the ignorance of the fire service showed through more so on these blogs than the video.
It's called an accident.. Maybe a bit of oversight on all parties.. From FC, DFC, Eng Co., Prop Maker.
You can see that the plastic was put up to redirect the sprinkler head output on BOTH props.. I assume clear plastic was used to show the roll over of fire on the ceiling. Also act as a faux wall.
Look on Dave's sight and see the other prop made by gov't testing lab. Same type of plastic...
Everything would have been fine if NO plastic was used or maybe plywood was used to act as the faux wall.
Again, I chalk it up as a mistake turned into an accident.. Nothing more or less..
I certainly believe 99% FF's from a salty dog to a rookie would have overlooked this.
Stop slinging MUD..and be thankful one of your brothers was not seriously injured or worse.
More specifics, please. How about writing the story the way you would like it done.
You can't expect to invite the press to an event and expect us to ignore it when things don't go as planned.
The only reason I knew about this is because I was editing the demonstration to put on the site and saw it myself.
Hard one to overlook.
Sorry.
Statter
Let the comments begin on how fire sprinklers will put us out of the fire fighting business.
DO NOT call them!!!
Call the Fire Dept if you want some help.
The EMS part is why we're in this mess!!
DCFD -
That (demonstration) fire could have been extinguished from outside of the IDLH environment without the use of SCBA from a safe distance.
Risk Vs. Benefit ?
Good luck with your speedy recovery...both firemen and DCFD.
Lt. A.N. Onymous
Regarding "Mr. Anonymous". Just who is that anyway? Must be related to "They". Discourse of this nature is ruining civilized interaction and discussion. Sixty Six comments as I write this and the only people on this entire list that have any guts are Dave Statter and the other two gentlemen that gave their names. Sack up boys and girls - have the integrity and the courage to identify yourself or keep your saddleback opinions to yourself.
You paid guys think that because you get paid to do this job you are better than us "vollies" the only difference between us is the pay scale we should all be considered PROFESSIONALS but the "firefighter" that posted the above is just an egotistic punk who thinks he is better than us "redneck firefighters running around in our long coats and tall rubber boots"
This was a public relations/public education event. As such any and all aspects of fire control and full familiarization with the set design and makeup,materials used and expectations with the actual crew assigned for suppression should have occurred prior. This so everyone was on the same page. Critical errors ultimately have occurred which ultimately resulted in injured members. The DCFEMS Chief should have had a script and followed it,a couple of times he was out of synch, makes one wonder whether he was in front of the set or elsewhere. From the view of the camera man up until the plastic came down it was mostly good. This make no mistake was a live fire so 1403 should have been in place and
followed before ignition occurred. A entry team did indeed breach the opening so where was the safety line in case of an emergency. No sweep up and around the entry zone, Tunnel vision,lack of sizeup,good intent very poor execution. Not a great day for NIOSH to see this happening I expect. Best wishes to the members injured for a speedy recovery. We all learn from these types of incidents, one wonders what the real end result was for the students, which message will they remember,the burning members or that sprinklers actually work.
Please learn from their mistakes, there not the first ones to do something like this and Fore sure not the last ones.
Give the credit to the MC for this one. You know the OIC or the Safety Officer were watching.
Best luck to the burned firefighter, you will never forget this one.
p.s. one firefighter was fully inside this room, the other 2 were half way in. Replay it again and look closely.
Second, whether you are planning to go in our not, NFPA 1403 (although it may not apply) should at least cross your mind (secondary water sources/back up teams)if not just some dam safety and self preservation sense. They decided to go in, wouldn't you? They missed the burning archway they were proceeding under and that is what screwed them. If they had hit that it would not have been a big deal.
As a chief office I hope I never have to tell one firefighter to put another out!
-Greenshield
Proud DCFD D-bag
I do hope all injuries heal quickly and egos get re-inflated soon.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to check IDs on here before allowing babies to post their negative, under-educated OPINIONS? A majority of these postings look like something you would find on a playground...really. These children are the ones standing on that same playground throwing sticks and stones. But wait, they claim to know it all...give me a break. Sh!t happens, plain and simple. Unfortunate as it is a firefighter got burned and I wish him a speedy recovery. That's what needs to be focused on. No Monday morning quarter backing, none of this " I told you so", If this and If that crap. Grow up people and stop using other people's misfortune for you to have a futile attempt at your moment of fame. Now hand me a baby wipe I have real work to do. Damn.
It's no wonder the fire service can't get funding and legislation in our favor. It's no wonder that when politicians think of who will control their disaster scenes, they think about making the cops the controlling agency.
This incident, like so many others in the fire service, reminds me of tigers eating their young. I'll watch the video later on, but the ranting and accusations, and just plain and simple hate toward each other is just amazing.
It used to be said that an argument in the fire service was just a little "brotherly disagreement". No, anymore, you all just can't abide each other. Its what is making us less professional and it's just plain sad.
2- These guys got so close they developed tunnel vission! All anyone had to do was to get the big picture, when you are raming down the throat of the fire it is very easy to loose the big picture
3- How does this look to the community? does this portray "profesionalism" whether they be vollies or career?
Who would have thought they needed a little more heat on their lids to look a little more salty! If you think that was an aggressive direct attack at the seat of the fire.. think again.. they were kinda slow.. maybe hesitant!
# posted by erikinsacramento : October 10, 2009 11:58 AM
*********************************
I wonder how many Eriks there are in Sacramento? Still sounds kinda annonymous to me.
We have seen the Video.
We have seen waht has gone wrong.
Some are trying to turn this into a Volunteer versus Paid bashing.
There are a lot of posters that wont man or girls up and use their real names. Those are the ones that are most likly vest wearing yard guards. Caddy your comments were right on target.
So where does it go from here.
I would hope that a lesson is learned and the video is used as a training tool.
I know we will use the video as a training tool.
In closing Bart get better.
Lt T. Cosgrove Jones
Drill School
I wasn't there, and I have only the one camera angle to go off of, as a result my understanding of the situation is limited to what I could hear and see.
I don't wear a white hat, but I would like to think that a chief that noticed there wasn't a second charged line would have mentioned it to the Lt. or Capt. on the engine. I realize that it is a demonstration fire, but if you think that taking easy proactive safety measures don't make sense, then Brother, I don't want to work with you.
I'll plead guilty, and admit that if I had done a walk through I probably wouldn't have noted the plastic sheeting as a hazard, and if I had advanced my hose team into the room, I would have made a similar cascade of errors.
As a retired Super Model I don't get that excited when the press show up to a scene and begin filming, and I never check the evening news for coverage of the fires I've worked, in an attempt to catch myself on TV, and I've never called my buddies and told them to turn on the evening news to catch me putting out the fire while they were on the difficulty defecating medical run. But that's just me. I've heard that some people get especially excited in front of the media, and try to make themselves look dramatic. Maybe that's what happened here.
This was a case of friendly fire in the fire service. I say own up to your mistakes and learn from them. I have a buddy who recently used the term "rekindle" as the first unit on scene, and is still looking for his ass after the battalion chief helped him reconsider his actions.
May the healing be fast for those injured, and enjoy those moments with our families at home, and at our 2nd home, the station.
Leave your real name if you stand behind what you say. Otherwise, you're just another mouth.
Grow a set.
Also, let's remember - RISK ALOT - SAVE ALOT !! RISK A LITTLE - SAVE A LITTLE !!! In all reality, what were we saving ?!?! I don't say that to be critical of these guys, I say it to remember to keep this in mind for the future.
"Never Forget" unfortunately came about because of 9-11 but I think it is a motto that fits EVERY firefighter in all aspects of our job.
Lastly, remember our # 1 goal, "Everyone goes home safe !!!".
Captain Steve Alderton
(sorry this came through as Anonymous, trouble figuring out how to change that part. Hope the signature is as good)
as for anonymous,man up
put your name to it
paid or vol. its the same.
fire is fire
w.b.v.f.d
capt. g w cisco
Actually we have had 100 comments or more a handful of times. The all time record for a single entry is 169 comments when we were the first to post the video of that collision between two St. Louis fire trucks.
Others entries that I found with a quick look that topped 100 are the PGFD ambulance billing controversy, a delayed EMS response in Loudoun, and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol vs. EMS story.
I believe we have posted a little more than 11,000 comments since STATter911.com started in May of 2007. Anyone have an idea which topic (over multiple postings) has received the most comments?
Statter
this link is very relevant to the comments on this post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IU1bzZheWk
What does this video have to do with EMS you idiot? You sound like the typical uneducated DCFD redneck Firefighter who continues to blame EMS on everything because you don’t know how to fight a fire. Just look around to some of the finest fire departments around this country that run first-rate fire and EMS services to their community. Why can’t DCFD do the same thing…because we have these back woods uneducated FF’s who can’t even past a basic EMT class.
Wow. For someone who wants to talk about being uneducated- People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. I believe you meant to say "pass a basic EMT class". Oh and the Youtube video that was posted, isn't necessarily in reference to EMS or Fire. It's about beating a dead horse. And for your edumacation tonight, I want you to Google "beating a dead horse" and finding out for yourself what it means.
But since I wouldn't want you to hurt yourself, I went ahead and did it for you. According to wikipedia, "Beating a dead horse" means "Flogging a dead horse", (alternatively "beating a dead horse" in some parts of the Anglophone world) is an idiom that means a particular request or line of conversation is already foreclosed or otherwise resolved, and any attempt to continue it is futile.
Have a nice day.
Paid or unpaid we have the same training like it or not, and paid or unpaid... YOU cannot dispute the fact that was a dumb move. Have we not been trained to monitor our surroundings? Who's idea was the plastic anyway???
The only difference in a live burn drill is that WE light the fire all the same precautions still need to taken. While we may not need to employ a fast team for a container fire we should still think far enough ahead to have members in gear with a back up line!
THINKING will keep you alive brothers, two simple words: SIZE UP.
No one person there could have predicted the plastic would melt?
I would be will to place a bet the PROBIE did!
David Pfeil "Retired" DCFD
This will be lengthy, for which I apologize, but as one of the Elders of our tribe, I must respond to this dialog. It is my intention to be helpful and constructive, bringing a bit less Heat and a little more Light to the discourse. I’ll address three specific subjects: Identity, The Incident and Your Dialog.
(1) Identity: I agree with those of you who said that if you have something constructive to bring to the discussion, you should identify yourself. Since most of you neglected to tell the rest of us who you are and why we should read your comments, I’ll set an example. I bring to the table 20 years in the Fire Service, 17 years as a fire equipment specialist and 10 years as a fire instructor and consultant. I am an adjunct instructor at more than a dozen municipal, county and state fire academies around the country, and a published author and staff member at Fire Nuggets, the online publication dedicated to firefighter competence and safety. And believe me, I’ve made my share of mistakes both on and off the fireground, but there isn’t time or space for that here.
(2) The Incident: First, let me add my voice to those who wish the injured firefighters a speedy recovery from their burns; that’s most important! But Mark Twain got it right when he said, “Why do they call it Common Sense? I find it to be most uncommon.” The evolution was not about how to fight a room & contents fire. It was a sprinkler demonstration. Period. Once the point had been made about how quickly the fire can grow, the prop could have been extinguished with a single nozzle set at a narrow fog pattern from a safe distance without entering the prop. It has nothing to do with bravery or machismo…it’s…well…common sense. Failing to do that, an alert safety officer in full turnout gear could have grabbed the hose, pulled the three guys out, lined them up and extinguished the burning plastic on them in about ten seconds. Simple as that.
(3) The dialog on Dave’s blog about this incident reveals an appalling amount of ignorance, immaturity and anger that frankly is a disgrace to the Fire Service. Whether you are a career firefighter with “issues” about volunteers, or a volunteer or paid-on-call firefighter with “issues” about career firefighters, my advice to you is the same: get over it. Your dialog is an embarrassment to us all. And for the record, the term “professional” firefighter should not be used simply to describe someone who receives a paycheck for what we do. The term best describes one’s Training, Experience and most important, Conduct…both on and off the fireground.
A final thought about writing in general and blogs in particular: if you find your words are so immature, so utterly lacking in benefit to others and frankly so embarrassing that you’re not willing to identify yourself, you might ask yourself why are you even participating? That’s it from here. Be well…do good work…and Stay Safe!
The rube is smarter than this. If not mistaken he was just the narrater not the IC on this.
Besides, if you define drag, thats usually a pulling motion, not a pushing motion, tool.
I hope ya feel better buddy. Accept the the script for pain killers, belive me it helps!
I'm not sure who this anonymous poster was, but since it infers that this is "just bustin' chops", makes me think that it might have been regarding my earlier post.
Since I'm not a probie and I'm well over thirty, with thirty years in the fire service, I'm pretty sure I know the difference between an angry mob and "bustin' chops". And I'm not at all hiding behind any psuedonym, and I'm happy to discuss the whole incident civilly rather than by calling names and making unfounded accusations.
Maybe instead we need to figure out what went wrong, support our injured brothers, learn from what happened here, and not repeat the mistakes. Then the huge point: move on.
Finally, it's very easy to point the finger, and to be the Monday morning quarterback. Hopefully we've all learn something from this event and move forward.
National Public Safety Week is far too important to us. The fire safety messages we spread for the positive, far out weights this black mark!
"Take Care and Be Safe"
A guy could have put 20 gallons of water on that from 30 feet away... except that's not EXCITING enough. (for the public, OR us)
And to the guy saying it wasn't a training evolution it was public education- why the hell wasn't it made into a training evolution? They're doing a live burn and OBVIOUSLY needed the training.
Okay- I'm being a bit of a jerk by saying that but fact is this is an excellent demonstration of how tactical entertainment at even the smallest scale can result in bad things happening. Remember offensive benefit from defensive positions? Fire is put out by water mingling with heat- not firefighters.
Want proof? The sprinkler did a MUCH better job of controlling the fire than the firefighters did.
Links to this post:
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]


