Tuesday, January 22, 2008

 

UPDATE: Failure to use seat belts and continuing door problems are confirmed as factors in MD FF's fall from engine

Video of investigation after firefighter fell off PGFD Engine 809

National Seat Belt Pledge

Read Chief Billy Goldfeder's comments about this incident on The Secret List

The Bladensburg Volunteer Fire Department (PGFD Station 809) admits its firefighter was not wearing a seat belt when he fell from a fire engine on Monday. At the same time, on its website, Bladensburg brings up mechanical concerns about the door on the Prince George's County Fire/EMS Department's reserve engine. Today, a PGFD spokesman confirms there are known problems with the design of the door.

The volunteer firefighter, Ryan Raneiri, was treated and released at Prince George's Hospital Center after falling off Engine 809. Raneiri was part of a 5-person crew enroute to a reported first-due apartment fire on Monday afternoon. PGFD spokesman Mark Brady says the fire engine was negotiating the turn from Edmonston Road onto Route 450 when the firefighter fell off the piece. The location is just down the street from Station 809. Brady says no other vehicles were involved. The incident happened at 1:30 PM.

On the Bladensburg VFD website the department writes, "(the incident) does bear witness and proof as to why seat belts must be worn". Bladensburg also notes "this is not the first time firefighters have fallen from this type, make and model fire truck in Prince George’s County".

The engine involved is a 1989 Seagrave normally operated by Station 822. Spokesman Mark Brady says the vehicle was inspected this morning and problems were noted that would allow the door to open when it shouldn't. In an email to STATter 911, Brady writes:

On this particular unit and the majority of our similar units the interior door latches are designed to open the door when the lever is pulled upward. There is a stop on the lever to prevent the lever from going down. However, if lever is overpowered in the down position it will break the stop and permit the door to open from the inside by pulling the lever up or pushing it down. The unit was inspected this morning and found that both rear cab doors would open by pushing the lever down. This situation will be corrected prior to it going back in service.

Brady also confirms this is not the first time this problem has been discovered:

Following a similar incident with Fire/EMS Station 807, the Safety Office conducted a survey to determine if there were any other vehicles with a similar issue. Those units were identified and corrected at that time. Apparently, it does not take a lot of effort to over ride the lever stop in the down position and any unit that is found to have this condition is repaired as soon as possible by Apparatus Maintenance. The Prince George's County Fire/EMS Department will never "ignore" a safety issue that is brought to our attention, rather, any and all safety issues will be addressed as soon as being identified.

Brady reports the inspection found no problems with the seat belts.

Entire response from PGFD Chief Spokesman Mark Brady:

Dave: As soon as the incident occurred on Monday a "Safety Review" was put into motion. These Safety Reviews are standard procedure after injuries and significant crashes. The engine that Fire/EMS Station #809 was using was a 1989 Seagrave, normally assigned to Fire/EMS Station #822.

On this particular unit and the majority of our similar units the interior door latches are designed to open the door when the lever is pulled upward. There is a stop on the lever to prevent the lever from going down. However, if lever is overpowered in the down position it will break the stop and permit the door to open from the inside by pulling the lever up or pushing it down. The unit was inspected this morning and found that both rear cab doors would open by pushing the lever down. This situation will be corrected prior to it going back in service.

We could not find any issue with the seat belts. They are operating normal.

Following a similar incident with Fire/EMS Station 807, the Safety Office conducted a survey to determine if there were any other vehicles with a similar issue. Those units were identified and corrected at that time. Apparently, it does not take a lot of effort to over ride the lever stop in the down position and any unit that is found to have this condition is repaired as soon as possible by Apparatus Maintenance. The Prince George's County Fire/EMS Department will never "ignore" a safety issue that is brought to our attention, rather, any and all safety issues will be addressed as soon as being identified.

As far as any other circumstances regarding the incident on Sunday, they remain under review by the Safety Office.

Additionally, I would like to provide you a recent Prince George's County Fire/EMS Department Newsletter in PDF format. Please take the time to open the document and read the articles on the Fire Service Seat Belt Pledge. Thank you for posting this important information for all in the Fire/EMS Service to read and to pledge and sign-up.

Here is Bladensburg VFD's full account of the incident:

At approximately 1330 hours today Engine 809 (Prince George’s County Reserve Engine 222), having just cleared a non-emergency public service call was dispatched, along with the box assignment for a first due reported apartment building on fire at 5461 Madison Way. Supplemental message via radio was that there were smoke conditions in the hallway preventing escape with a female occupant who could not breathe and was going to jump from the 2nd floor.

Engine 809, responding from the previous call made a left turn onto Annapolis Road off of Edmonston Road. In the process of this turn the crew door on the officer side of the apparatus came open and Fire Fighter R. Raneiri fell from the apparatus landing on the street. The remaining crew instantly notified the Officer and Driver who brought the apparatus to an immediate stop and all went to render aid. F. F. Raneiri crawled to the curb and sidewalk to keep from getting hit by the remaining impatient drivers. He was boarded and collared for transport to PG Hospital Trauma Center where he was treated and released, with no serious injuries, within two hours. Ryan is home resting well at this time, a little sore and bruised but in good spirits.

We are very fortunate this time but it does bear witness and proof as to why seat belts must be worn. This is not the first time firefighters have fallen from this type make and model fire truck in Prince George’s County. Although repair orders were issued in years previous malfunctions can still occur, thereby reminding all to exercise caution and safety regulations at all times.

Bladensburg would like to extend our heart felt “Thank You” to all personnel (22, 28, 33, 14 and numerous others) who responded, filled in or called to check our well being and that of brother Raneiri. Your thoughts and words are greatly appreciated.

Click here for today's fire/EMS news from STATter 911


Comments:
Geeze.. Ok He wasn't wearing a seatbelt. But if these doors on these particualr Seagrave Engines that are used by the PGFD reserve apparatus fleet would stay shut, he would not have fallen out. Doors on fire engines need to stay shut and the doors on this one, are my guess similar to those on other engines, are FAULTY and cause for doors to open with little or no involvment of the occupant.
 
He was not wearing a seatbelt, end of discussion. I dont care if the truck didn't even have doors, that is irrelavant, Do you think he will be suspended for violating department and State laws, NO!!
Brush it off as just an accident. The firefighter and the officer and driver should be suspended!.
 
Let's face it, the doors on apparatus should be fully functional, but we should all act like adults and be accountable for our actions. This individual fell out of the fire engine due to his failure to follow departmental policy. Fortunately in this incident he ended up being able to walk away. Will the next individual be so lucky?
 
I can tell none of you have ever been on a fire engine going to a first due box. Seconds count. Do you want the crews to take the time getting dressed for the fire at the station or on the scene? It takes a little over a minute to accomplish this task. Some apparatus is not designed to wear a seatbelt and a SCBA at the same time! State laws do not mandate rear passengers to be belted. It is extremely unfortunate this brave lad was injured going to a fire. I feel a measure ensuring firefighter safety is the real topic here. Faulty doors, with a history of same on a first due engine? Shame on the county for putting these boys at risk. What if the seat belt failed? His secondary back-up was never there to begin with. If your going to enforce such policies, you may want to start practising what you preach first.
 
Ok he should have been wearing the seatbelt. But can we also agree that the door to the apparatus should not have opened? I think yes.

If he was wearing a seatbelt he would not have fallen.

If the door would have remained shout, he would not have fallen.

The doors on those reserve apparatus are faulty, PGFD knows it.
 
Yes, fully functioning doors and equipment are extremely important to our safety but how many of our brothers and sisters have to die or be seriously injured before we wake up and buckle up?!

Raneiri was lucky, plain and simple.

My best to Raneiri and the crew, but let's learn the lesson and buckle the 'F' up.
 
Why should the Officer and Driver be suspended? Would all 3 be disciplined on the Career side? Hell NO they wouldn't and all know that.

This department (Station 809) has a seat belt policy and I know the Chief, for years, has stated seatbelts are always required. But, Chiefs just changed maybe policies did also, I don't know but if the policy exists and it was violated by the fire fighter why should the Officer and Driver be suspended if they believe their personnel are following policies.

What would you like to do, have the Officer and Driver buckle every damn fire fighter into their seats now before going on a call?

Lets get real, the PGFD has known about these problems for years, why is something like this always pushed back on the volunteers while any career issue is swept under the carpet, rarely to be reported in the media!
 
First I would like to state that I am glad that he was not hurt on this incident.

Some of the previous comments are skirting around the real issue. Not abiding by safety policies. HE SHOULD OF BEEN WEARING A SEATBELT!!!!PERIOD END OF STORY.

Just because they were running a P.O.S. reserve apparatus is no excuse for not wearing your seatbelt. Sure the door handle opened up and down, but had he been wearing his beltand seated he never would of fell out, and WHEN have you ever heard of a seatbelt failing??????

Should he face disciplinary actions?? YES I believe that BVFD should step up to the plate and set a standard that all should follow. PGFD has said that they have never punished individuals for such actions "because they felt that the individual had learned a hard lesson" Well obviously this IS NOT WORKING !!!!

Drivers and Officers should make the attempt to ensure that everyone is belted on the apparatus before moving. I work in a large metropolitan dept. in the DC area and we have that rule. and it has not slowed down our responses to alarms? You people who condone not wearind your seatbelt should think about how you would feel trying to explain to a wife/daughter/son/mother or any other family member that you a LODD because someone forgot to wear their seatbelt. I Know I never want to experience that feeling.
 
There is no excuse for not wearing seatbelts while on a moving piece of fire apparatus. All major departments have a seatbelt policy, most individual stations have a seatbelt policy, the makers of these fire apparatus plaster the vehicles with seatbelt warnings, and the NFPA manadates the use of seatbelts.

I'm glad the guy wasn't hurt badly and I'm glad he's back home.

However, once he fully recovers, the station chief needs to suspend him for non-seatbelt use. This should not be left up to the county to do. We as volunteers need to clean our own houses. Although this firefighter may have learned his lesson the hard way, discipline needs to be taken to set an example of how seriously the volunteer leadership takes the use of seatbelts in that station.

We cannot worry what the career staff gets away with, its about running a top notch fire service organization committed to giving the best service to the community and the safety of our personnel.

Now, with all that being said, seatbelt use is spotty at best in any department in this area, paid and volunteer alike (MD, VA, DC). To say othewise is not being honest.

As the saying goes, if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
 
I don't want to hear this turn into a career vs volunteer situation. Seatbelts don't care who you are. I don't care what he is, no seat belt was being used...end of story.
 
You can provide all the safety equipment in the world, but ultimately it is useless when the person it was designed to protect fails to use it. It takes no extra time to buckle/unbuckle a seat belt and yes, I spent over 30 years riding apparatus so I know what it entails and more than once the seatbelt kept me from falling out when a cab door openeded rounding a corner.
 
I had a similar incident in 2005 in Montgomery County in a very similar unit......1991 Seagrave
I was in the officer seat it was 4:30 in the morning......and yes I failed to buckle my Seat Belt!! No excuses!! we turned on to the street and out I went!! I had my gear on......the driver stopped immediatley!! I got back in and we continued to the call.....I didn't report it, but someone did......The driver and I were suspended.....I had to give safety talks.....I was very sore and could hardly walk for a couple of weeks!The unit had the seal belts and door latches replaced!
 
No real fireman wear a seatbelt. End of story. How can you put on a bottle while belted in. You guys are the death of the fire service. Next you will issue every fireman a reflective vest and a pocket protector.
 
there is an on-going "debate" in the fire service as to the "need" to be moving around in the cab trying to put on turnout gear and SCBA while enroute to a call. Some departments require the crew to don their gear prior to boarding the rig and others have relocated the SCBA from the seats in the cab to other locations on the rig. There was a recent article in a fire service publication about such intiatives. Most vehicle manufacturers install seat belts to accomodate a "reasonable" size person that may not take into account the bulk of the turnout gear or space that is now taken up by the SCBA, mounting bracket, etc. At least one manufacturer now offers an SCBA bracket that can restraint an occupant in the seat once he dons the SCBA straps but I wonder if the SCBA straps are "rated" as a vehicle occupant "restraint system"? Okay, enough on that. If wearing the seat belt is a problem due to its lack of length for someone seated in that area, buy a seat belt extender. They are readily available- you see them on commercial aircraft at the beginning of every flight during the safety briefing. The flight crew will provide one to any passenger needing some extra "length" to accomodate their girth.

There are simple solutions to overcome problems.

And yes, the firefighter should be disciplined for "breaking the rules." Evidently, others within their organization "knew" that these door handles had a history of inadvertent operation. Whatever happened to personal accountability?
 
its always amazes me how when someone in PG county makes a dumb mistake all the defenders come out saying how no one else has ever gone to a first due box or knows what its like. What a unique place PG must be! You guys are so fast its amazing, tell me how fast did this rig get to the first due box? Oh it didnt make it cause somebody did something stupid? wow they saved a lot of time not buckling up didnt they! Glad no civillians died because these guys had thier head up thier butts!
 
"No real firemen wear a seatbelt" That is one of the most ignorant comments I've ever heard. You need to get your head out of your backside. I've been in the fire department 30 plus years and I see no correlation between wearing your seatbelt and not being able to do your job. If you fall out of the rig on the way to a call, you can't do anyone any good. Seatbelts ensure your own safety. Lets not be stupid about it.
 
You can put on a SCBA with your seatbelt on. Just takes forethought and practice.
 
How many of the so called experts critizing the fireman from Bladensburg actually are members of fire depts that actually run fire. Most are from the big city depts wanna be's like Fairfax that run 1 or 2 fires a month and put them out when there is nothing left to burn and from the outside. Stop saying everyone else wears seatbelts because in real life who in PG and DC really does.
 
you have to be kidding me!!! one of you idiots wrote that no real firemen wear seatbelts.my god!and some others want to turn it into a career vs volly slapfest,nothing out of the ordinary in the "COUNTY" .and yet another is concerned with saving those precious two seconds it takes to put on a seatbelt.the truck has bad latches right,who inspected the rig and allowed it on the road in the first place? and yes the two up front should be suspended.they are both in charge of the truck and the firefighters.i never can figure you guy's out down there.if those precious seconds of not putting the belt on were saved,then how about the time they took to render care for him after he fell out.if they were first due,what about the lady that was going to jump from the building? i bet she was glad that he didnt buckle up.THINK ABOUT IT !!!! pat from maine
 
There is NO room for debate here. It matters not if Career or Volunteer, what matters is sticking to the facts.

There are policies in place therefore follow them.

The firefighter failed to follow the policy. I know Bladensburg and there is a policy in place as there is in PG County. I also know the driver and I know that he wears a seatbelt and has always encouraged everyone else too. I also know that it is not mandatory at this station because it is just another rule.

That is why they have another Chief, they don't want to follow rules and the last one was like a military colonel, there was no room for mistakes. Hell, this Chief is the one that ran undispatched, ran a red light responding after being put in service, broad sided a car and killed a lady all while arguing on the radio about going to the call. He should not be allowed to be a Chief Officer, if this is the way he does things do you really think they are going to enforce a silly seat belt policy?

Yes discipline the firefighter and hold the Chief accountable, he is the leader but why, as one poster said, should you discipline the driver and officer? Unless they personally check for themselves they can only assume the firefighters are following the policies, right!

Lets set the example, Everyone Buckle up !!
 
This is unbelievable...there are actually some ignoramuses that are defending not wearing a seatbelt. And what does Fairfax have to do with this? Get off it you imbicels. Seatbelts are there for a reason. No different than any other safety equipment.
 
First off my thoughts and prayers go out to the Firefighter who was injured, I wish him a speedy recovery. If the apparatus is moving you should be seat belted end of story. I don't buy the seconds count comment. If your not finished getting all your PPE on do it when the apparatus stops. What isthe risk/benefit here. We can't help the citizens if we can't get to there emergency safely. Stay Safe and Remember EVERYBODY GOES HOME!
 
what about apparatus checks? it's a reserve pumper,go over it with a "fine tooth comb",did anybody find the faulty door handle's? did anybody other than the shop know that they were only to be pulled up to open?
 
I think we should all start fighting fires from the outside
 
I guess this is a big issue but guess what we have had the same problem on our front line truck for 3 weeks now it has been reported to the ranks via verbal and paper. Tuesdays shift asked our deputy chief about it and he says he had no idea what was going on even after being told verbal 2 shifts ago again. So anyway I told the BC I thought it was unsafe and we needed to switch to a back-up truck and he advised me to use some webbing and tie it down.. So that is what we did.. have some pics later. med1874@alltel.net
 
The most intelligent option is to remove all SCBA from the interior of the piece. Then everyone could belt in and not worry about donning their SCBA until the arrive on the scene. This would only add about one minute to begin operations. I am sure the elderly lady or the baby trapped on the second floor wont mind, and if they do , who cares they will be dead and wont be able to tell anyone.
 
One of these days we are going to smarten up and realize that as dangerous as this job is it wouldn't be quite as dangerous if we quit doing stupid stuff.

The people arguing against seatbelts have a noble, but misguided arguement. Sure it's our job to rescue the citizen in distress...but our first priority is OUR OWN SAFETY. We've done the citizen in distress no good if we don't arrive on the scene, like this situation. What good rid E809 do for the citizens on this call? How many seconds did this firefighter save by not putting on his seatbelt?
 
You can point out the safety aspects till your blue in the face, unfortunately the audience is from the "me" generation that labor under the delusion that they are invincible and nothing is gonna happen to them. The only way to get through to them is let them fall out of a moving piece of fire apparatus and maybe they will finally learn that the seatbelts in a fire truck serve as safety item.
 
Door doesn't work properly. OK. Fix it. But the door not working is no excuse for NOT wearing a seat belt. Some say, Oh it saves valuable time not belting. So does not slowing or stopping at stop signs and red lights? Would you do that? Yea, it's macho and old school not to wear belts, but, it is the law. 27% of Firefighter fatalities occur while responding, that's 1/4 of FF deaths. That should be reason enough. As far as the Volunteer / Paid issue. Building fires and vehicle accidents don’t discriminate, paid or volunteer, dead is dead.
 
Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]