Friday, October 26, 2007

 

STATter 911 exclusive: DC firefighter could be fired over firehouse sleepover



The quarters of Engine 24 and Rescue Squad 2 from DCFD.com

As a grand jury looks into allegations of a sex ring involving District of Columbia firefighters, an unrelated claim of possible sexual misconduct, until now, has gone unnoticed. STATter 911 has learned a veteran firefighter is expected to face a department trial board next month after being accused of having a woman share his bed inside a DC firehouse.

When asked about the case from this summer, DC Fire & EMS Department Battalion Chief Kenneth Crosswhite will only say they have received allegations and have recommended the case to a trial board. Crosswhite says he "is not at liberty to discuss it anymore". But STATter 911 has received a copy of the charges against the firefighter who was assigned to drive Rescue Squad 2, located with Engine 24, at 5101 Georgia Avenue, Northwest.

According to a memorandum sent to the firefighter on September 24th by Assistant Fire Chief Larry Schultz, "the Department is seeking the maximum penalty of termination" in this case. The papers show two charges against the firefighter claiming he had an unauthorized female visitor in his bunk and that he obstructed a department investigation.

The incident occurred on July 1st. According to the documents sent to the firefighter, a department lieutenant reported that "when he entered the technician's bunk room, he found you in bed with a female with the lights off". At the firehouse, there are a number of private sleeping quarters in addition to the general bunk room.

The papers refer to a department special report stating the firefighter admitted to having the female in his bunk. The report claims the firefighter told his superiors that "she needed a place to stay" and that he admitted to having the woman in bed with him.

The firefighter is accused of providing "misleading and inaccurate statements to superiors during an official investigation" because of a report he wrote about the incident four days after it happened. The charging documents claim in that report the firefighter recanted his earlier admission:

You wrote that at 0800 hours, after being relieved and off duty, you remained in quarters of Engine Company 24 to await transportation home. You added that you needed assistance with some personal belongings and beddings, so you asked your "transportation" to accompany you to quarters to remove your belongings.

The fire department claims the firefighter first told superiors the woman arrived at 4:00 a.m. and in his later statement wrote that she showed up at 7:45 a.m.

Sources tell STATter 911 that the firefighter is still working with full pay, but has been placed in a job where he does not interact with the public.


Comments:
This is very sad indeed. To think that a once great department that was built by men of courage and character has now been made a laughing stock by the actions of a few. Those "old timer's" are probably turning over in their graves. I guess integrity and pride don't mean anything anymore to some of the "new breed".
 
Let me guess...he's also a volunteer chief in P.G.
 
You get what you hire, the more you hire the more trash you hire. Everydays a new adventure for DCFEMS. It has nothing to do with the leadership, it the hiring practice. The department lost the military style it carried in the previous years, now its kindercare.
 
This seems to be the norm in the entire metro area. It's not just the District, it crosses the lines into Prince Georges also. It's more important to hire a quota than a qualified , reputable person who personafies the traditional dedicated responder of the past. Lack of control over the volunteers in P.G. and the employees in D.C. tarnish the entire Fire and EMS community.
 
Come on guys, get off your high horses. We have all made dumb decisions throughout our fire department careers. Thats all this is a dumb decision. And as far as the "old timers" are these the same old timers who had cocktail time every evening? And finally you all should know what General Patton said about soldiers the same applies for firefighters
 
What is everyone complaining about. You make this out to be a serious crime like arson. All he did is share a bed with a female. Heck at least he isn't gay. The question to ask - Did he miss a call or not respond to a fire due to the woman being there? If not, then drop this. It is hard enough to get personnel trained and have available to protect us during our time of need.
 
What wonderful logic. I guess next you will think it is ok to snort coke on the job or strong arm rob a homeless person.
 
This is crazy! What difference does it make if a man has a female in his room, would a female get the same criticism if there were a male in a females room? This is being blown way out of control. This is a person whom we put our lives in there hands. We as volunteers put time and pride in emergency service and personally I think that's all that should matter.
 
Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]