Monday, July 23, 2007

Paying to Drive

Let me start off by saying I don't think one should be complaining about something of they don't have a better solution, but I find all of this talk about congestion fees and HOT lanes somehwat distressing. HOT stands for high occupancy toll lanes.

Both plans are intended to reduce traffic and congestion. I'm all for that. But, I think when you start charging for the privelege of avoiding traffic and congestion, then you start to penalize one group while rewarding another.

If you have the money, then you would likely pay to get to your destination faster. But, if you can't afford to buy your way out of the traffic jam, then you're just another poor slob who is going to have to wait. Fees like these are most regressive on the people who can least afford them.

I see this as another way to divide people and breed class resentment. Can't you picture the bitter people who are stuck in traffic watching the "wealthy" pass them by? I just see more of the "Haves vs. the Have Nots".

Another argument in favor of these plans is that they will inspire people to use mass transit. Perhaps some, but Metro is not always the best option, especially if you don't live near or work near a station. And what about the taxis and the delivery trucks that have no choice? They have to pay, ad ultimately all of the people who use their services will have to pay.

I wish that I had a better answer, I don't. But I do expect more imaginition from those that we elect.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home